We should end the suffering

It’s hard to dispute Frank J.’s logic here. After all these years, can anyone really believe there is hope for recovery? Isn’t the humane thing to do to just let nature take its course? Feeding through artificial means is wrong on so many levels, and there is anecdotal evidence that being kept alive to endure more years of suffering goes against desires expressed in the past. Besides, who are we to intervene? If God’s will means death, then so be it. Frankly it has gone on long enough. No more debate. The recent court precedent should settle this matter once and for all. If a little life insurance changes hands as a result, so what? That’s what life insurance is for. The focus needs to be on doing what is right. And clearly, seeing an end to a miserable existence should be an obvious choice. It’s our duty as right thinking people. So let every voice ring with the resounding mantra of “let ’em starve.”

(it’s called satire folks)

4 thoughts on “We should end the suffering

  1. This case is no different than Hugh Finn remeber him? His wife wnated to disconnect his feedign tube here in VA and Gilmore intervened? You were totally against the governor’s interference and supported her right as his spouse to make the call. Have you switched sides on this position? Do I need to start a private account to keep myself from being improverished and starving to death in the event this should happen to you?

  2. Pingback: buy valium

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *