And now ladies and gentlemen…

….The President of the United States of America:

For younger workers, the Social Security system has serious problems that will grow worse with time. Social Security was created decades ago, for a very different era. In those days people didn’t live as long, benefits were much lower than they are today, and a half century ago, about 16 workers paid into the system for each person drawing benefits. Our society has changed in ways the founders of Social Security could not have foreseen. In today’s world, people are living longer and therefore drawing benefits longer — and those benefits are scheduled to rise dramatically over the next few decades. And instead of 16 workers paying in for every beneficiary, right now it’s only about three workers — and over the next few decades, that number will fall to just two workers per beneficiary. With each passing year, fewer workers are paying ever-higher benefits to an ever-larger number of retirees….

….If you’ve got children in their 20s, as some of us do, the idea of Social Security collapsing before they retire does not seem like a small matter. And it should not be a small matter to the United States Congress….

…We must make Social Security permanently sound, not leave that task for another day. We must not jeopardize our economic strength by increasing payroll taxes. We must ensure that lower income Americans get the help they need to have dignity and peace of mind in their retirement. We must guarantee there is no change for those now retired or nearing retirement. And we must take care that any changes in the system are gradual, so younger workers have years to prepare and plan for their future.

As we fix Social Security, we also have the responsibility to make the system a better deal for younger workers. And the best way to reach that goal is through voluntary personal retirement accounts. Here is how the idea works. Right now, a set portion of the money you earn is taken out of your paycheck to pay for the Social Security benefits of today’s retirees. If you are a younger worker, I believe you should be able to set aside part of that money in your own retirement account, so you can build a nest egg for your own future.

Here is why personal accounts are a better deal. Your money will grow, over time, at a greater rate than anything the current system can deliver – and your account will provide money for retirement over and above the check you will receive from Social Security. In addition, you’ll be able to pass along the money that accumulates in your personal account, if you wish, to your children or grandchildren. And best of all, the money in the account is yours, and the government can never take it away.

The goal here is greater security in retirement, so we will set careful guidelines for personal accounts. We will make sure the money can only go into a conservative mix of bonds and stock funds. We will make sure that your earnings are not eaten up by hidden Wall Street fees. We will make sure there are good options to protect your investments from sudden market swings on the eve of your retirement. We will make sure a personal account can’t be emptied out all at once, but rather paid out over time, as an addition to traditional Social Security benefits. And we will make sure this plan is fiscally responsible, by starting personal accounts gradually, and raising the yearly limits on contributions over time, eventually permitting all workers to set aside four percentage points of their payroll taxes in their accounts.

He said it, I believe it, and that settles it. Anyone disagree?

10 thoughts on “And now ladies and gentlemen…

  1. You are starting to sound like a sheep. Never thought I would see the day. I do not disagree him not because he said and therefore I believe, I don’t disagree with him because, even though Medicare may be the biffer problem, Social Security stills needs tweaking to keep it viable given our demographics. However, as they say the devil is in the details. I am encouraged that thre President has decided to limit investment opportunities and though not mentioned last night in his speach (or did I miss it) it is reported that he adjusted his position and now favors automatic rebalancing. Now, that he has addressed the problem for future beneficiaries in their 20s,30s and 40s,I want to see what he proposes for those of us entering our 50s and beyond that are still working and not yet drawing our benefits.

  2. Geez, Carol. Cut me some slack. I have been defending you from twenty-somethings all night. I quoted what the President said in his speech. I believe what he said to be true and right. And that settles it for me. That is not being a sheep. If I didn’t agree I would have made some other pithy remark.

  3. No what you said and I quote, “He said it, I believe it…” You did not put a period after the first “it” so the second part of the sentence becomes dependent on the first. Moreover, if the second part of your sentence were not dependent on the first part then why include the first part at all? Thus the meaning of your statment is that you believe it simply because he said it. Sheep.

  4. Pingback: fitness magazines

  5. Pingback: buy valium

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *