I don’t think that this should come as a surprise to anyone. When corporations are faced with increased costs, they tend to raise prices or reduce expenses. Or both. So, I’m guessing that not only will current employees and retirees be losing prescription drug benefits, AT&T won’t be doing much new hiring in the short term either.
Is this the change we were hoping for?
AT&T Inc. will take a $1 billion non-cash accounting charge in the first quarter because of the health care overhaul and may cut benefits it offers to current and retired workers.
The charge is the largest disclosed so far. Earlier this week, AK Steel Corp., Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Co. and Valero Energy announced similar accounting charges, saying the health care law that President Barack Obama signed Tuesday will raise their expenses. On Friday, 3M Co. said it will also take a charge of $85 million to $90 million.
AT&T also said Friday that it is looking into changing the health care benefits it offers because of the new law. Analysts say retirees could lose the prescription drug coverage provided by their former employers as a result of the overhaul.
AT&T rival Verizon Communications Inc. was among 10 companies that sent a letter to congressional leaders in December warning that their costs would increase with the health care changes. Verizon spokesman Peter Thonis said the company had no comment.
Also on Friday, Reps. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., and Bart Stupak, D-Mich., said they are asking the CEOs of Caterpillar, Verizon, Deere and others to testify at an April 21 House subcommittee hearing on claims that the health care law could hurt their ability to provide health insurance to workers.
Yo, Waxman and Stupak! Here’s a clue for ya–maybe you should have had those hearings BEFORE passing this destructive law.
Me, I don’t find the word (or the body part) dirty or otherwise offensive.
Back home in the USA the television networks have forbidden use of the word “vagina”. This ad substituted “down there” for vagina, and was still turned down by two networks. Give it a watch, I thought it was funny to see the Kotex folks mocking the industry advertising euphemisms for “feminine hygiene products”.
More info on the controversy here, and I loved this quote:
That provoked Amanda Hess, author of The Sexist blog, to observe: “Now, the commercial contains no direct references to female genitalia – you know, the place where the fucking tampon goes.”
Not sure if this banning is sexism or not. I remember some of those Viagra ads which were chock full of double entendres about sustaining a woody. But I think it’s probably more about prudish attitudes. After all, if we start talking about vagina’s on TV, the whole moral foundation of great nation is at risk. Or something.
By the way, if anything, Korean ads for “sanitary products” are even more subdued.