<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jacob from ROK Sojourn and Sean Penn: Separated at birth?</title>
	<link>http://mccrarey.com/2010/03/10/jacob-from-rok-sojourn-and-sean-penn-seperated-at-birth/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 07:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Fortuneate</title>
		<link>http://mccrarey.com/2010/03/10/jacob-from-rok-sojourn-and-sean-penn-seperated-at-birth/#comment-349641</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mccrarey.com/2010/03/10/jacob-from-rok-sojourn-and-sean-penn-seperated-at-birth/#comment-349641</guid>
					<description>You are certainly free to disagree and I don't have any desire for you to die.  ROK acknowledges that folks will disagree and states that he will not bother discussing the issue with those he knows he cannot persuade--yes you would be in that camp.  His comments about shut the hell up were tongue in cheek--very evident from the post.  You are trying to portray him as something he is not in order to discredit him and by extension the science behind climate destablization.  Won't work.

And John it is isn't a world view.  Its an understanding of science.  Anyone who could use the term "settled science" doesn't understand science.  You don't get it -no sense in further discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are certainly free to disagree and I don&#8217;t have any desire for you to die.  ROK acknowledges that folks will disagree and states that he will not bother discussing the issue with those he knows he cannot persuade&#8211;yes you would be in that camp.  His comments about shut the hell up were tongue in cheek&#8211;very evident from the post.  You are trying to portray him as something he is not in order to discredit him and by extension the science behind climate destablization.  Won&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>And John it is isn&#8217;t a world view.  Its an understanding of science.  Anyone who could use the term &#8220;settled science&#8221; doesn&#8217;t understand science.  You don&#8217;t get it -no sense in further discussion.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John McCrarey</title>
		<link>http://mccrarey.com/2010/03/10/jacob-from-rok-sojourn-and-sean-penn-seperated-at-birth/#comment-349636</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mccrarey.com/2010/03/10/jacob-from-rok-sojourn-and-sean-penn-seperated-at-birth/#comment-349636</guid>
					<description>Glad you found a fellow traveler on the road to ignorance Fortuneate.

Are you hoping I get cancer and die a slow and painful death because I disagree with you?

And you can put your fingers in your ears and yell "la la la la" at the top of your voice but it doesn't change the fact that AGW science is far from settled.  I've posted numerous links laying out the basis for that.  But you and Jacob don't want to see or read anything that challenges your world view, do you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you found a fellow traveler on the road to ignorance Fortuneate.</p>
<p>Are you hoping I get cancer and die a slow and painful death because I disagree with you?</p>
<p>And you can put your fingers in your ears and yell &#8220;la la la la&#8221; at the top of your voice but it doesn&#8217;t change the fact that AGW science is far from settled.  I&#8217;ve posted numerous links laying out the basis for that.  But you and Jacob don&#8217;t want to see or read anything that challenges your world view, do you?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Fortuneate</title>
		<link>http://mccrarey.com/2010/03/10/jacob-from-rok-sojourn-and-sean-penn-seperated-at-birth/#comment-349635</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mccrarey.com/2010/03/10/jacob-from-rok-sojourn-and-sean-penn-seperated-at-birth/#comment-349635</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the link to ROK.   I enjoyed his humorous portrayal of the long-suffering (of fools),exasperated voice of reason and I loved that video.  

I must admit I found it funny as hell that when incapable of talking the science you did exactly what he said those he used to debate did--say anything you can think of to retain plausible denialbility that you aren't making an ass of yourself--"Hatred of all those who do not share their world view.  Hatred of freedom and values that celebrate a diversity of opinion."

You tried to deflect it from a conversation about science to one about equality and patriotism.  John if you said that 10 pm at night was daytime no one would appreciate or value your diversity of opinion--especially not if it were detacting from a conversation on how best to maximize usage of daylight hours.  They would just think you were a dick and everyone knows that a dick has no brain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link to ROK.   I enjoyed his humorous portrayal of the long-suffering (of fools),exasperated voice of reason and I loved that video.  </p>
<p>I must admit I found it funny as hell that when incapable of talking the science you did exactly what he said those he used to debate did&#8211;say anything you can think of to retain plausible denialbility that you aren&#8217;t making an ass of yourself&#8211;&#8221;Hatred of all those who do not share their world view.  Hatred of freedom and values that celebrate a diversity of opinion.&#8221;</p>
<p>You tried to deflect it from a conversation about science to one about equality and patriotism.  John if you said that 10 pm at night was daytime no one would appreciate or value your diversity of opinion&#8211;especially not if it were detacting from a conversation on how best to maximize usage of daylight hours.  They would just think you were a dick and everyone knows that a dick has no brain.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

